FreeOrion

Forums for the FreeOrion project
It is currently Wed Dec 13, 2017 7:14 am

All times are UTC




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 156 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:28 am 
Offline
Creative Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 2:17 am
Posts: 643
Thats another part I didn't like about Moo 3 is that constant ratio. It makes deep space combat during mid games nearly impossible, and very difficult even in the late game. The shortest path between star in Moo3 nearly invariably going through starlanes, but then all the stars were connect and FO we can a choice so it's not as bad I guess.

In the example, the ratio I see is 2:1. This is a problem, imo, becuase it makes starlane in the early game where it is the most important, ineffectual. But if you make the ratio too high, like Moo 3's 7, starlane is the only way to travel.

@ablaze
Some game sense: most games have tech level up to 99 with critcal mass at 50-60, so tech 40 is mid-late game. I can bet you that 35 level won't something trivial like chemical rockets.

starlane aren't disabled, they are less effective--big difference. Using constant allows starlane to be effective early when they matter the most and not as a big deal latter when advance military tactics can be deployed like multi-front assault rather then banging on your front gate where all your defenses are like an idiot.


Last edited by skdiw on Thu Sep 04, 2003 8:32 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 3:43 am 
Offline
Creative Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 2:17 am
Posts: 643
Ahhh! galaxy generation is locked!

If it's not too late, plz make starlanes Ax+B and not strictly ratio Ax. And second, plz don't make every stars connected through with starlanes. I rather see starland more like specials rather than norm.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 5:17 am 
Offline
Cosmic Dragon
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2003 12:37 am
Posts: 2175
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Starlanes should be thought of as like highways (star gates at each entry point) between star systems, like Free Lancer. And you should be able to upgrade them, so you can travel faster through them.

Offroad should be where pirates lerk, unexplored mysteries, I don't know what.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 5:47 am 
Offline
Creative Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 2:17 am
Posts: 643
umm.. utilae, did you read my other posts on how ratio starlane affects gameplay? I know the concept of starlanes. I just have reservations on how it will work. I'm sure you can even upgrade to wormhole, but read my other posts!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 11:47 am 
Offline
Space Floater
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 1:52 am
Posts: 31
Location: Germany
skdiw, deepspace-combat is not passed, and I really doubt that it will get passed. About your ratio-doubt: a constant is just fine, wheres your problem? e.g.

ORT: 2 turns distance * 6(constant multiplier) * 0.5 (tech boni) = 6 turns.
ORT: 2 turns distance * 6(constant multiplier) * 0.3 (we have developed a bit) = 4 turns.

Sure, Starlanes will always be faster than offroad, but a freeway will always be faster than a country road (except you get caught up in a traffic jam ... . :roll: :) ).

_________________
zaba zaba zud zud


Last edited by Odi on Fri Sep 05, 2003 12:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 10:42 pm 
Offline
Creative Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 2:17 am
Posts: 643
uhh... I am having hard time understanding you Odi. I really like FO, but I like FO(except if it sucked).? You are from Germany so I understand why your writing is bad. You should write in simple sentence then and forget rhetoric. This isn't an English class so no worries.

Firstly, I don't see anything about deep-space combat anywhere else. I know deep-space combat is not passed because we aren't even there yet (plus its not a issue to pass). Among other things not passed: research tree, diplomacy, spying.... so what is your point? I gurantee you deep-space raid will be allowed and will be a good strategy, maybe some race will capitalize on this. What kind of retarded war game that only allow front gate assaults? I'll just mass planetary defense on this system that connects to rest of my territory and win with research victory because that system has nothing but more effective system defenses?

Having a constant term is a very simple and elegant solution to advancing techs. We can use simple moo 1 or warpdrive system while getting effects that we want: mainly, rushes are hard to pull early and colonization are clustered, and naturally, to mid or late game, anything is possible and race aren't as dependent on that map because we practically have the ability to recreate universes. Your example doesn't make sense. I am NOT saying ratio is bad; I am saying Ax+B, allow a constant term B in addition to ratio A. How hard is that? Only one more line of code for modders and a plethera of possibilities.

Sometimes I feel like I'm talking to a rock--unimaginative and stubborn. And yes, for the tenth time, technology can affect A and B; yes, you can mod A and B; and YES, my idea encompass the original ratio A idea, but it ADDS more. God!

_________________
:mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:12 am 
Offline
Creative Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2003 6:32 am
Posts: 215
Location: Kassel / Germany
skdiw, we lost lotsa information with a previous incarnation of this forum. Thats the reason you don't find it. We discussed it for some time, came up with some defense plans and such, but decided that its not feasible. Its not following the #1 rule of this game: KISS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:15 am 
Offline
Creative Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 2:17 am
Posts: 643
And KISS is?

_________________
:mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2003 6:44 am 
Offline
Creative Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 6:10 pm
Posts: 314
Location: Amidst the Inferno.
"Keep It Simple Stupid." Although I have often thought "Keep It Simple, Keep It Stupid."

_________________
Time flies like the wind, fruit flies like bananas.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2003 1:38 am 
Offline
Creative Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 2:17 am
Posts: 643
lol, I like your jokes ablaze!

So what did we decide about basic defense plans... someone should bring it alive in another thread or sticky so ppl know.

_________________
:mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2003 1:33 pm 
Offline
Space Squid

Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 8:47 pm
Posts: 53
A mid-late research could change the starlane:deep space ratio from the original let say 1:6 to 1:3 (1:2 ?) or something similar. So it will help to the players to build in the beginnig and fight in the end. :)

_________________
-------------------------------------------
Te vagy a Blade Runner. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2003 4:41 pm 
Offline
Creative Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 2:17 am
Posts: 643
I think that is what some ppl are saying. But why not just use it constant in the beginning and the 'ratio' will just decrease naturally? is that even simpler?

_________________
:mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2003 7:53 pm 
Offline
Space Squid

Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 8:47 pm
Posts: 53
I think one reason:
1. It is a good technology for the tech tree. :)

_________________
-------------------------------------------
Te vagy a Blade Runner. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2003 6:47 pm 
Offline
Space Krill

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 6:03 pm
Posts: 7
Location: Austin, TX
hope someone sees this:

can't recall the name of the game, (ol sega genesis game) but in it you take a race, and do the conquest thing, but it's based on the type of ship you get to use.. (more shi vs ship type thing) anyways.. the main map screen I always liked, cuz unlike MOO, (where all the stars sit there, no animation) this game had a revolving system.. it didn't change much really, it was just alot more pleasing to see...

you could watch the stars expand and contract while you sat there (the galaxies are constantly movin, ya know...).. it looks cool when you see the lines pop up for when yer gettin ready to move... any chance this could be incorporated?

_________________
It's tough at the top, tough at the bottom, hard to survive, in a world of destruction


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2003 5:03 pm 
Offline
Dyson Forest

Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 4:50 pm
Posts: 205
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Tek: U are correct when u say the galaxy is 'always moving', however it takes a full 225 or so MILLION years to make a full rotation where we are in it. And generally games only cover a few thousand years... So to all intents and purposes stars may as well be stationary... :)

But from a gameplay perspective, it's a nice idea :)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 156 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group