FreeOrion

Forums for the FreeOrion project
It is currently Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:24 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 6:18 pm 
Offline
Creative Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 11:45 pm
Posts: 3291
Yup, but if it's in the popup brief description you get on the start game page it'll be clearer.

_________________
Mat Bowles

Any code or patches in anything posted here is released under the CC and GPL licences in use for the FO project.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2017 9:59 pm 
Offline
Space Floater
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 42
Abaddoni are underwhelming as playable race. SubHab is easy to research and only gives them a brief boost, not cutting it as race' selling point. Broad tolerance isn't unique and other races have it together with other boni. Maybe give them huge planet and better supply?

_________________
Team S.M.A.C.: play multiplayer with us!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2017 10:53 pm 
Offline
AI Lead, Programmer
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 6:25 pm
Posts: 4390
Quote:
NB: I'd like to try to do this in part as we finish off the current release cycle, so no new species or mechanics that would need serious work from the AI team as they need space to catch up with other projects.
Please don't look for any significant adjustments from the AI team for new species for quite a while. Perhaps we should add an optional "ManualSelectionOnly" field to the species specification, so that any species designated as ManualSelectionOnly would be valid for manual selection in the galaxy setup window, but would not be used for random species selections for any players (whether human or AI)? I would much rather volunteer to code up the parsing and logic for that than take on trying to make the AI competent with a bunch of weird species right now.

I think we've been making some good progress recently with AI movement and invasion logic, and Morlic just did a refactoring of our Military AI to help us more readily make further progress with invasion and general military logic, and I think we really need to keep focusing on that for a fair while.

_________________
If I provided any code, scripts or other content here, it's released under GPL 2.0 and CC-BY-SA 3.0


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2017 10:00 am 
Offline
Creative Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 11:45 pm
Posts: 3291
Dilvish wrote:
Quote:
NB: I'd like to try to do this in part as we finish off the current release cycle, so no new species or mechanics that would need serious work from the AI team as they need space to catch up with other projects.
Please don't look for any significant adjustments from the AI team for new species for quite a while. Perhaps we should add an optional "ManualSelectionOnly" field to the species specification, so that any species designated as ManualSelectionOnly would be valid for manual selection in the galaxy setup window, but would not be used for random species selections for any players (whether human or AI)? I would much rather volunteer to code up the parsing and logic for that than take on trying to make the AI competent with a bunch of weird species right now.

I think we've been making some good progress recently with AI movement and invasion logic, and Morlic just did a refactoring of our Military AI to help us more readily make further progress with invasion and general military logic, and I think we really need to keep focusing on that for a fair while.
Fully aware, the phrasing should be "that doesn't need any work from the AI team", so no weird extra mechanics: I was slightly worried about the Abaddoni getting a free tech unlock but that's not a problem.

What I've done is basically ready to merge in if/when I've time to get the stringtables updated, anything else will wait till I've caught up with the solar hull and other stuff I'm testing.

I have many other projects in mind that might need AI work, they're being put off until you guys say you've time, hence doing this as it shouldn't take any effort in that regard as long as I get the AI tags right.

_________________
Mat Bowles

Any code or patches in anything posted here is released under the CC and GPL licences in use for the FO project.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2017 11:27 am 
Offline
Release Manager, Design
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 12:56 pm
Posts: 4289
Location: Sol III
Dilvish wrote:
Perhaps we should add an optional "ManualSelectionOnly" field to the species specification, so that any species designated as ManualSelectionOnly would be valid for manual selection in the galaxy setup window, but would not be used for random species selections for any players (whether human or AI)?
Sounds like a good idea.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 4:32 am 
Offline
Creative Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 11:45 pm
Posts: 3291
Krikkitone wrote:
For Radons... I have an old species idea that could fit with them

Replicons.... self-replicating robots (origin lost to history..killed off or forgotten by creators)
poor science, backward society (they do high tech stuff in a very low tech way)
high population growth.. high industry would fit with that too.
Thanks for this suggestion, I've finally got back to this and put an edited version of your original text in the updated PR, it works quite well.
Expanding the Playable species mix by MatGB · Pull Request #1251 · freeorion/freeorion

Basically it's good to go in as a first step and we can do more as/when we've got time.

_________________
Mat Bowles

Any code or patches in anything posted here is released under the CC and GPL licences in use for the FO project.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:31 pm 
Offline
Space Squid
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2017 6:32 pm
Posts: 82
Don't mean to grind anyone's gears, 'speciallly as i'm new around here, but i'd like to chime in on some points in this topic (mostly in opposition to moving in MatGB's proposed direction at this time).

1. Increasing the number of playable species.

I don't like this idea right now. I like what you said about increasing the number of interesting playstyles, but as you point out, the AI isn't really ready for that, so it may not be feasible right now, unless we manage to insert the proposed "manual-only" tag or something similar to avoid the AI getting stuck on a faction it doesn't have the logic to use.

The new added races don't add diversity to the current cast. The "Replicons" really are just that, a replicate of the George, just slightly inferior. There are already several species that feel this way. Multiple species are basically "+200% research" and a couple other indistinct traits. As mentioned, the Abaddoni are extremely underpowered. Large HW and a 24(?)-point tech, ntm the defensive troop malus, in exchange for George's +supply, telepathic and +150% industry?

I'd rather see a small cast of interestingly different species than a larger cast of what are essentially clones of one another.

2. Environmnetal preference balance

I'd also like to disagree with the sentiment that the playable races should be equally spread across the spectrum of possible environmentlal preferences.

I think the assymetry provided by having more species fighting over, say, the terran-side of the wheel can add some advantage to the races with 'more unique' proclivities.

If you're the only species that like barren worlds, that could give you an inherent advantage in the colonisation race. This can create more of a distinction between the various planetary environments, instead of them all being basically the same, just some symmetric group rotation away.

The only thing that really separates them right now other than that is how useful Exobots are.

~~~~~~
Well, thanks for reading. That's my input for now.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group