Various issues I've noticed
Moderator: Oberlus
- UnifiedStars
- Space Floater
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:21 am
Various issues I've noticed
After converting a gas giant (Steila I) into an artificial paradise world, I built a chato colony and terraformed it. As one can see from the screen cap, the planet doesn't appear to have changed into an adequete one at all. (Terraforming also removes the Gas Giant Generator, but coverting the gas giant to an artificial paradise does not?)
The A.I. seem to love building duplicate buildings in the same system on different planets.
Another issue I'm having is that the changed resource growth meter values from "Force Energy Structures" isn't being factored into the planet popup windows. When I check a turn later the production values seem to be working correctly, so I think the problem is just the text.
As this is a slightly older version of FO (April 4th), I'm not sure if these problems still appear in newer test builds. Anyways, thanks for your time!
Here's some saves: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4NpY ... Wl2SnZfb0U
Re: Various issues I've noticed
Could you be more specific? Which buildings? Any special Circumstances?UnifiedStars wrote: The A.I. seem to love building duplicate buildings in the same system on different planets.
Do you have a savefile or AI-log of a game with this problem? Or (as last resort) some screenshot of such a system?
If I provided any code, scripts or other content here, it's released under GPL 2.0 and CC-BY-SA 3.0
Re: Various issues I've noticed
Um, he already provided some save files:Morlic wrote:Do you have a savefile or AI-log of a game with this problem?
UnifiedStars wrote:Here's some saves: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4NpY ... Wl2SnZfb0U
- UnifiedStars
- Space Floater
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:21 am
Re: Various issues I've noticed
Here's some pics of the multiple A.I. buildings problem...
http://imgur.com/a/Yx0tc
I have a feeling that it has something to do with Mu Ursh. It's getting ridiculous that they're building orbital incubators, xenocoordination facilities, and energy compressors/engineering bays at every single colony that contains the damned race, as well as trying to populate all their planets with Mu Ursh. I understand that +2 on weapons is pretty good, but they could at least regulate their military productions centers to only a few stars. Perhaps if they built less buildings and decided on a single ship hull then I wouldn't have dominated them so much (There was also an asteroid processor on one of their previous colonies).
http://imgur.com/a/Yx0tc
I have a feeling that it has something to do with Mu Ursh. It's getting ridiculous that they're building orbital incubators, xenocoordination facilities, and energy compressors/engineering bays at every single colony that contains the damned race, as well as trying to populate all their planets with Mu Ursh. I understand that +2 on weapons is pretty good, but they could at least regulate their military productions centers to only a few stars. Perhaps if they built less buildings and decided on a single ship hull then I wouldn't have dominated them so much (There was also an asteroid processor on one of their previous colonies).
Re: Various issues I've noticed
It is related to Mu Ursh, the AI used to do it with all shipbuilding species, now it tries to have multiple colonies of Good or Great pilots able to build ships even if they're cutoff. Same applies to why they build multiple hull types and don't really build in batches, they're not very good (yet) at predicting if/when they'll be cut off or defending supply chokepoints, so Dilvish had them spread production around a lot.
It is sub optimal, but it's a lot better than it used to be and has got better regularly last few years.
Worth noting your screenshot does show that it has been converted from a Barren world into a Radiated one, at some point soon it'll become Inferno, then Toxic. It's not instantaneous but it's a good compromise system that I remain quite proud of (artificial paradise world that is, gaia special predates my involvement). We possibly need to explain the effects better and make more use of the wheel of habitability graphics, if you right click the planet and look at the suitability report, it'll hopefully explain things a bit better.
It is sub optimal, but it's a lot better than it used to be and has got better regularly last few years.
Terraforming shouldn't affect the GGG, converting it to a planet should, but there might be some delay based on when it was processed. Also, Gaia doesn't trigger every turn, it's a random chance each time (0.5), it will, eventually, convert it, and do so quicker than terraforming—unless you get really unlucky, random is hopefully close to actually random now (there was an RNG bug) but it's 50% chance each turn in theory.UnifiedStars wrote: After converting a gas giant (Steila I) into an artificial paradise world, I built a chato colony and terraformed it. As one can see from the screen cap, the planet doesn't appear to have changed into an adequete one at all. (Terraforming also removes the Gas Giant Generator, but coverting the gas giant to an artificial paradise does not?)
Worth noting your screenshot does show that it has been converted from a Barren world into a Radiated one, at some point soon it'll become Inferno, then Toxic. It's not instantaneous but it's a good compromise system that I remain quite proud of (artificial paradise world that is, gaia special predates my involvement). We possibly need to explain the effects better and make more use of the wheel of habitability graphics, if you right click the planet and look at the suitability report, it'll hopefully explain things a bit better.
It is, known issue, some of the effects that change meters aren't taken into account on the 'next turn' stats, and some are but weirdly (the damage control techs in particular never display correctly). Fixing it is a backend issue and it'll eventually be got to but it's a lower priority at the moment.Another issue I'm having is that the changed resource growth meter values from "Force Energy Structures" isn't being factored into the planet popup windows. When I check a turn later the production values seem to be working correctly, so I think the problem is just the text.
Thank you, valid concerns. Even if one is working as intended, that it's not working as expected by a newer player remains a problem, we're not explaining things well enough and, let's face it, there's enough to learn in this game as it is.As this is a slightly older version of FO (April 4th), I'm not sure if these problems still appear in newer test builds. Anyways, thanks for your time!
Mat Bowles
Any code or patches in anything posted here is released under the CC and GPL licences in use for the FO project.
Any code or patches in anything posted here is released under the CC and GPL licences in use for the FO project.
Re: Various issues I've noticed
"the planet doesn't appear to have changed into an adequete one "
Chato have a broad planet tolerance; radiated and barren planets are both considered "poor" by the Chato, even though those types are beside each other on the planet wheel.
so, when the Gaia special randomly terraformed Steila I, from barren to radiated, the quality went from poor to poor XD
(Artificial Paradise Worlds are created with the Gaia special and start at barren)
it appears from your screenshot that no production points have actually been spent on that terraforming, yet. fortunate, it would have been wasted
Chato:
Environmental Preferences:
swamp : adequate
toxic : good
inferno : adequate
radiated : poor
barren : poor
tundra : hostile
desert : hostile
terran : poor
ocean : poor
Chato have a broad planet tolerance; radiated and barren planets are both considered "poor" by the Chato, even though those types are beside each other on the planet wheel.
so, when the Gaia special randomly terraformed Steila I, from barren to radiated, the quality went from poor to poor XD
(Artificial Paradise Worlds are created with the Gaia special and start at barren)
it appears from your screenshot that no production points have actually been spent on that terraforming, yet. fortunate, it would have been wasted
Chato:
Environmental Preferences:
swamp : adequate
toxic : good
inferno : adequate
radiated : poor
barren : poor
tundra : hostile
desert : hostile
terran : poor
ocean : poor
- UnifiedStars
- Space Floater
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:21 am
Re: Various issues I've noticed
Thanks for the clarification guys! I don't think I realized that Gaia specials were updated for later versions, and heaped loads of micromanagement on myself when trying to terraform an automatically changing world. However, I'm not sure if converting an asteroid belt into a tiny planet is worth it, as currently with all the population techs researched I have 16 pop. on an asteroid. Does a tiny planet even have that much?
I've also noticed that the detection ranges seem somewhat wonky as compared to earlier versions. Sometimes systems that look like they should be revealed aren't.
I've also noticed that the detection ranges seem somewhat wonky as compared to earlier versions. Sometimes systems that look like they should be revealed aren't.
Re: Various issues I've noticed
No, not really, but you can make it a Good world for a non Exobot species and Tiny gets that massive supply boost (which might be more useful if/when we rebalance the supply granting techs). I am however thinking of upping it to Small (Artificial Paradise and Factory Worlds is the relevent thread for discussion).UnifiedStars wrote:Thanks for the clarification guys! I don't think I realized that Gaia specials were updated for later versions, and heaped loads of micromanagement on myself when trying to terraform an automatically changing world. However, I'm not sure if converting an asteroid belt into a tiny planet is worth it, as currently with all the population techs researched I have 16 pop. on an asteroid. Does a tiny planet even have that much?
NB: as a result of your feedback I changed the wordings for the Gaia special and the artificial worlds last night to hopefully be a bit clearer, thanks for the prompt (seriously, writing game documentation is a pain at times, sometimes you completely forget to put something in anywhere because it must be covered elsewhere).
I think that's correct, note your detection circle doesn't quite cross the centre of the system which is the point it's measuring to/from, but it may have changed (Geoff?). Try zooming in/out a bit to see if it's clearer where the circles are at different levels.I've also noticed that the detection ranges seem somewhat wonky as compared to earlier versions. Sometimes systems that look like they should be revealed aren't.
Mat Bowles
Any code or patches in anything posted here is released under the CC and GPL licences in use for the FO project.
Any code or patches in anything posted here is released under the CC and GPL licences in use for the FO project.
- UnifiedStars
- Space Floater
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:21 am
Re: Various issues I've noticed
I see, thanks.
If I remember correctly, didn't outposts also have supply? Or was that changed recently? Back in a build at the beginning of the year I could research orbital construction/other supply techs and outposts would gain the benefit too. But now even with orbital construction, my outposts have 0 when they should have 1. (If the mechanic changed then would the pedia need updating?)
(Set default starlane colour to red) Colony at Cassini working correctly with 2 supply (Chato + Orbital Cons.), but outpost at Mambo still has none.
If I remember correctly, didn't outposts also have supply? Or was that changed recently? Back in a build at the beginning of the year I could research orbital construction/other supply techs and outposts would gain the benefit too. But now even with orbital construction, my outposts have 0 when they should have 1. (If the mechanic changed then would the pedia need updating?)
(Set default starlane colour to red) Colony at Cassini working correctly with 2 supply (Chato + Orbital Cons.), but outpost at Mambo still has none.
Re: Various issues I've noticed
Outposts can/do have supply, but it's modified, if you open up the arrows next to the vision range you'll be able to hover over the supply meter, it'll probably say something like Orbital Construction +1, Gas Giant -1 (that's what I've got in front of me in my game).
Supply is modified by planet size, the bigger the gravity well the lower the supply. It's also modified by species, an outpost on a Tiny world will get +2, give it a standard supply species it'll get +1, but give it Mu Ursh it won't get a bonus, give it Etty or George it'll get a bigger bonus.
You can refuel at Mambo, but it won't link up without external help or another bonus (Gravitic Architecture is cheap).
And yes, the Pedia article needs updating, just read it, it appears to be missing a word or two as well as not being clear.
Supply is modified by planet size, the bigger the gravity well the lower the supply. It's also modified by species, an outpost on a Tiny world will get +2, give it a standard supply species it'll get +1, but give it Mu Ursh it won't get a bonus, give it Etty or George it'll get a bigger bonus.
You can refuel at Mambo, but it won't link up without external help or another bonus (Gravitic Architecture is cheap).
And yes, the Pedia article needs updating, just read it, it appears to be missing a word or two as well as not being clear.
Mat Bowles
Any code or patches in anything posted here is released under the CC and GPL licences in use for the FO project.
Any code or patches in anything posted here is released under the CC and GPL licences in use for the FO project.
- UnifiedStars
- Space Floater
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:21 am
Re: Various issues I've noticed
Ermm...probably got overlooked during programming, but if you play a solo game the conquest victory popup still pops up.
I was trying to run the game on a school computer, but the A.I. wouldn't load. I believe that the cause of the problem is due to the firewall & permissions (Locked down so tight I can't even right click lol). Debug console always shows C:/../.., not my ./saves/save folder.
Autosaves also aren't working, b/c they can't change from APPDATA to the manual save dir I think, and I can't access APPDATA. Is there some way to bypass this? Proxy?
Also a small quibble; the cellular growth chamber and xenocoordination facility is unlocked by multiple techs on the organic line, is there a reason for the redundancy? (i.e. Contrived Symbiosis unlocks Growth Chamber, and the next one, Mono-Cellular Expansion also unlocks it too?)
I was trying to run the game on a school computer, but the A.I. wouldn't load. I believe that the cause of the problem is due to the firewall & permissions (Locked down so tight I can't even right click lol). Debug console always shows C:/../.., not my ./saves/save folder.
Autosaves also aren't working, b/c they can't change from APPDATA to the manual save dir I think, and I can't access APPDATA. Is there some way to bypass this? Proxy?
Also a small quibble; the cellular growth chamber and xenocoordination facility is unlocked by multiple techs on the organic line, is there a reason for the redundancy? (i.e. Contrived Symbiosis unlocks Growth Chamber, and the next one, Mono-Cellular Expansion also unlocks it too?)
Re: Various issues I've noticed
Completely overlooked during testing, I never play solo gamesUnifiedStars wrote:Ermm...probably got overlooked during programming, but if you play a solo game the conquest victory popup still pops up.
I forget who did that coding, anyone?
Can't help with the other issue, beyond me, sorry.
No idea why it used to be that way, it still is that way because I keep forgetting to remove the extra unlocks (techs tell the game what they unlock, it's not buildings telling the game what unlocks them, multiple techs say they unlock the same thing). Plus, until recently working it out manually was going to be a pain but now Geoff's put the icons into the tech research view it'll be quick and easy.Also a small quibble; the cellular growth chamber and xenocoordination facility is unlocked by multiple techs on the organic line, is there a reason for the redundancy? (i.e. Contrived Symbiosis unlocks Growth Chamber, and the next one, Mono-Cellular Expansion also unlocks it too?)
Edit: Done with @793b642
Mat Bowles
Any code or patches in anything posted here is released under the CC and GPL licences in use for the FO project.
Any code or patches in anything posted here is released under the CC and GPL licences in use for the FO project.
- UnifiedStars
- Space Floater
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:21 am
Re: Various issues I've noticed
Stealthed monsters/ships will still be accounted for in your ship movement when passing a system where they are/will be arriving at. Maybe this can be changed so that your client won't factor it in? (Loaded the game a couple turns early and built a supertester colony)
http://imgur.com/a/yIbzs
For the pedia, some species entries have a preferred focus, while others don't have a line with that information. Would it be better for everything to be consistent? (Kobuntura also have +200% industry, but preferred focus is research?)
http://imgur.com/a/yIbzs
For the pedia, some species entries have a preferred focus, while others don't have a line with that information. Would it be better for everything to be consistent? (Kobuntura also have +200% industry, but preferred focus is research?)
-
- Programmer
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 12:08 am
Re: Various issues I've noticed
In the first shot, did you have a ship at that system before?
For the species focus, MatGB recently did a pass on these: forum thread.
The focus preference is what the species enjoys doing, so they will see a happiness bonus from it.
e.g. Kobuntura excel at industry (compared to other species), but they would much rather be trying to find a Precursor.
For the species focus, MatGB recently did a pass on these: forum thread.
The focus preference is what the species enjoys doing, so they will see a happiness bonus from it.
e.g. Kobuntura excel at industry (compared to other species), but they would much rather be trying to find a Precursor.
Any content posted should be considered licensed GNU GPL 2.0 and/or CC-BY-SA 3.0 as appropriate.
Re: Various issues I've noticed
Actually, that's a weird side effect of the derelict scout bonus (which we're rewriting soon anyway), you can only see that system because of a vision boost so parts of the game don't know you can see it yet, if you hit end turn you should find you can go on past it without stopping, that there's a monster arriving there shouldn't be affecting it.UnifiedStars wrote:Stealthed monsters/ships will still be accounted for in your ship movement when passing a system where they are/will be arriving at. Maybe this can be changed so that your client won't factor it in? (Loaded the game a couple turns early and built a supertester colony)
http://imgur.com/a/yIbzs
Yup, that's all intentional. Most species now have a preferred focus, but not all, and some prefer to do things that aren't the thing they're best at—Kobuntura, specifically, are written to prefer that side and are a bit overpowered anyway, so having them prefer to do what they're not best at is a balance thing and a flavour thing (if it weren't, I might have considered rewriting them). A species I know doesn't have a focus is Gysache, they're, currently, the most overpowered species so I didn't want them to have the benefit.For the pedia, some species entries have a preferred focus, while others don't have a line with that information. Would it be better for everything to be consistent? (Kobuntura also have +200% industry, but preferred focus is research?)
Mat Bowles
Any code or patches in anything posted here is released under the CC and GPL licences in use for the FO project.
Any code or patches in anything posted here is released under the CC and GPL licences in use for the FO project.