FreeOrion
http://www.freeorion.org/forum/

[Nov. 20 test build (e6848d8)] Missing info on tech hover
http://www.freeorion.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=10794
Page 2 of 2

Author:  MatGB [ Tue Nov 28, 2017 8:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [Nov. 20 test build (e6848d8)] Missing info on tech hove

dbenage-cx wrote:
En dash is probably the "proper" character to use for the separation (or em dash, depending on interpretation), but did not feel it warranted compiler specific handling when the difference with hyphen-minus is not likely to be noticed.
For style, I tend to prefer em dash and have used it in documentation without thinking about it: it's the only non standard character I know the Win alt code and linux unicode key sequence for.

Author:  dbenage-cx [ Tue Nov 28, 2017 11:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [Nov. 20 test build (e6848d8)] Missing info on tech hove

Geoff the Medio wrote:
What's wrong with
Code:
u8" \u2013 "

I did not realize UTF-8 encoded string literal is not implementation-defined.

If it is a noticeable difference to others, can open a PR for change to em dash.

Page 2 of 2 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/