FreeOrion

Forums for the FreeOrion project
It is currently Mon Dec 11, 2017 4:51 pm

All times are UTC


Forum rules


Always mention the exact version of FreeOrion you are testing.

When reporting an issue regarding the AI, if possible provide the relevant AI log file and a save game file that demonstrates the issue.



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Issues in 0.4.1 RC 2
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 4:05 pm 
Offline
Design & Graphics Lead Emeritus
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:09 pm
Posts: 3858
Location: USA — midwest
Geoff the Medio wrote:
...but I think "Aggressive" describes the first option better than the (meaningless) "Standard". Also, there's no reason to assume or imply that "Aggressive" would be the normal / most commonly used setting.

I don't really care what a player might do more often -- depends on play style, but attacking and blockading your enemy is very easily understood as the default or normal interaction. I thought about "open" as the opposite to "secret", but that word has too many meanings to clarify anything.

"Aggressive" makes no sense for any empires you are not at war with.

Also, the same icons are used for both settings for empires and fleets. "combat.png" is unused.
Can you link one of them to different icons so i can help visually distinguish diplomatic status from fleet settings.

_________________
—• Read this First before posting Game Design Ideas!
—• Design Philosophy

—•— My Ideas, Organized —•— Get an Avatar —•— Acronyms —•—


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Issues in 0.4.1 RC 2
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:03 pm 
Offline
Programming, Design, Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 1:33 am
Posts: 12040
Location: Munich
eleazar wrote:
...attacking and blockading your enemy is very easily understood as the default or normal interaction.
I disagree, but I don't think it matters, as IMO the state / setting should give some direct indication of what it means, rather than assuming the player knows what "standard" means.
Quote:
"Aggressive" makes no sense for any empires you are not at war with.
And "Hidden" doesn't apply if you have a vision sharing agreement with an empire... There are going to be causes where the orders don't have any relevance, but I think we should focus their names to apply to situations when they are relevant.
Quote:
Also, the same icons are used for both settings for empires and fleets. "combat.png" is unused. Can you link one of them to different icons so i can help visually distinguish diplomatic status from fleet settings.
I've added fleet_aggressive.png, fleet_aggressive_mouseover.png, fleet_passive.png, and fleet_passive_mouseover.png.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Issues in 0.4.1 RC 2
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:06 pm 
Offline
Design & Graphics Lead Emeritus
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:09 pm
Posts: 3858
Location: USA — midwest
Geoff the Medio wrote:
And "Hidden" doesn't apply if you have a vision sharing agreement with an empire...

Vision sharing currently doesn't exist, and, while i like the idea, may not ever. I'm worried about explaining current behavior.

Quote:
I've added fleet_aggressive.png, fleet_aggressive_mouseover.png, fleet_passive.png, and fleet_passive_mouseover.png.

Thanks.

_________________
—• Read this First before posting Game Design Ideas!
—• Design Philosophy

—•— My Ideas, Organized —•— Get an Avatar —•— Acronyms —•—


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Issues in 0.4.1 RC 2
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:59 pm 
Offline
Programming, Design, Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 1:33 am
Posts: 12040
Location: Munich
How about "Control System" and "Hide"? This way they're both verbs, both sort of indicate the benefit or purpose of the settings (vaguely covering both attacking enemies and blocking supply propagation), and perhaps it makes more sense to not object to empires you're at peace with being present if you're controlling rather than aggressive?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Issues in 0.4.1 RC 2
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 10:29 pm 
Offline
Design & Graphics Lead Emeritus
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:09 pm
Posts: 3858
Location: USA — midwest
Geoff the Medio wrote:
How about "Control System" and "Hide"?

Sounds good.

revision 5089
"clarified-- if quick-- icons and lables for fleet stances."

_________________
—• Read this First before posting Game Design Ideas!
—• Design Philosophy

—•— My Ideas, Organized —•— Get an Avatar —•— Acronyms —•—


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group