FreeOrion

Forums for the FreeOrion project
It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 4:21 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: v0.3 review
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:43 am 
Offline
Space Krill

Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:45 am
Posts: 7
A better release, for sure, but still some bugs present.

Great graphics upgrade with the spinning planets.

Colonizing bug: you cannot have the fleet/ship selected while colonising, or the game crashes. You still must deselect the ship/fleet, then click the system, then click the colonise button next to the planet.

AI still pretty much lacking, but at least they know how to explore, and run from an uneven fight. AI cannot manage their planets, and end up with essentially 0.00001 population on them, or so.

Food production or some other aspect of planet management is bugged. Colonising your first planet sends your population growth rate on all planets cascading downward, and kills off your original planet if you don't set all focuses to food only. This was pretty much a game killing bug, and I don't desire to play any further games on this release.

Colonising puts far too few people on a planet, or the growth rates are far too small, and your colonies never become productive in the span of a normal game so far (100-150 turns).

Overall planet populations, or population caps probably need to be adjusted. I assume currently you're dealing in billions of people. Perhaps change to millions, or just some abstract number on a range of 2 - 100; tiny infernos to huge terran, respectively. There needs to be more variation and range between planets, or a larger difference in bonuses or negatives between types.

After your first colonisation, or after researching certain techs (not sure), all planets get bugged with bonuses & negatives they didn't have before. When the planet specials option is set to frequent, before a game, it ends up being way too frequent. Planet specials also make little sense - a terran with tectonic instability, tidally locked, slow rotation? It would not likely be terran!! This such a planet would be a wasteland, a barren or desert planet, at best, or an inferno at worst.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: v0.3 review
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 8:33 pm 
Offline
Space Squid

Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:17 pm
Posts: 50
that last one was a tech that you researched. read the description before you research


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: v0.3 review
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 4:14 pm 
Offline
Space Dragon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 10:35 pm
Posts: 470
Location: Earth
Why are you reviewing an unfinished game?? :roll: :?: :?

_________________
Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: v0.3 review
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:26 pm 
Offline
Designer and Programmer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:33 pm
Posts: 1771
Location: Orion
Zanzibar wrote:
Why are you reviewing an unfinished game?? :roll: :?: :?

Because they're going to have to finish it eventually..... :roll:

_________________
Warning: Antarans in dimensional portal are closer than they appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: v0.3 review
PostPosted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:57 pm 
Offline
Space Squid

Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:17 pm
Posts: 50
wait you guys have average games of only 150 turns? sheesh speed playing much? you cant have very many of the techs that early in the game.

oh asd in single player i find the computers quickly eliminate themselves. i havent gone past 200 turns yet because of it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: v0.3 review
PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:47 am 
Offline
Space Dragon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 10:35 pm
Posts: 470
Location: Earth
Bigjoe5 wrote:
Zanzibar wrote:
Why are you reviewing an unfinished game?? :roll: :?: :?

Because they're going to have to finish it eventually..... :roll:


When? In about 20 years?? :shock:

_________________
Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: v0.3 review
PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 4:26 pm 
Offline
Space Kraken

Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 4:50 pm
Posts: 205
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Zanzibar wrote:
Bigjoe5 wrote:
Zanzibar wrote:
Why are you reviewing an unfinished game?? :roll: :?: :?

Because they're going to have to finish it eventually..... :roll:


When? In about 20 years?? :shock:


We could probably extrapolate - The project began in mid 2003, it's now 4.5 years later and we're at version 0.3 (and have been for the last 2 years, albeit with "Release Candidates". That averages to 1.5yrs per version - 15years for 10 versions, minus the 4-5 that are gone, about a decade left then. :-S

So, do any of you guys happen to work on Duke Nukem Forever? :-D


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group