FreeOrion

Forums for the FreeOrion project
It is currently Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:28 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:07 am 
Offline
Space Kraken
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:03 pm
Posts: 151
qsswin wrote:
I really didn't need to conquer those planets. Some of them were not good EPs (I guess even cautious sometimes does that), and I had sufficient PP to win the rest of the game easily. So I felt that bombardment would be a good alternative to conquering every single last damn planet that belongs to another empire.

Something needs to be done to speed up the game in some areas. Possibly the problem is that the game is unfinished - when diplomatic options are available mopping up every last planet won't be necessary.

qsswin wrote:
Of course, as mentioned before, there is another use for bombardment: destroying the usefulness of a planet. I feel like automatic bombardment should maybe do a bit more damage, perhaps lowering other meters on a planet.

Automatic bombardment isn't always desirable. Something should be added to the current two options for fleet behaviour (attack or hide). If there was an option to attack fleets and an extra more aggressive option to attack fleets and bombard it would be better. Choosing to bombard each individual planet will become extremely tedious. It's already bad enough invading or colonising as much as is currently necessary to win.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:46 am 
Offline
Design & Graphics Lead Emeritus
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:09 pm
Posts: 3858
Location: USA — midwest
OllyG wrote:
Choosing to bombard each individual planet will become extremely tedious. It's already bad enough invading or colonising as much as is currently necessary to win.

Sounds like you are playing with too many planets per galaxy. These things are generally simpler than in other 4X games.

But i agree-- the game should be eventually balanced so you don't need to conquer every single planet to win, or colonize every possible planet to have a shot at winning.

_________________
—• Read this First before posting Game Design Ideas!
—• Design Philosophy

—•— My Ideas, Organized —•— Get an Avatar —•— Acronyms —•—


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 6:10 am 
Offline
Designer and Programmer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:33 pm
Posts: 2058
Location: Orion
eleazar wrote:
OllyG wrote:
Choosing to bombard each individual planet will become extremely tedious. It's already bad enough invading or colonising as much as is currently necessary to win.

Sounds like you are playing with too many planets per galaxy. These things are generally simpler than in other 4X games.

But i agree-- the game should be eventually balanced so you don't need to conquer every single planet to win, or colonize every possible planet to have a shot at winning.

Perhaps some method of scaling up bombardments and invasions as the game progresses (as was discussed for colonization in this thread) would help matters.

_________________
Warning: Antarans in dimensional portal are closer than they appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 9:12 pm 
Offline
Space Krill

Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:59 pm
Posts: 3
Is glassing planets going to give your race diplomatic penalties.When full diplomacy is included of course.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 10:20 pm 
Offline
Space Floater

Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 8:26 am
Posts: 29
Location: Freising
Hi to all and it is a pleasure reading through all those different ideas and threads...
This one here really got my attention...
I have been very fond of the bombard-idea!
For programming issues I was thinking, I would implement the most powerful bomb, I call it the Laser Scatter Bomb (sort of nuclear, emitted polarized light being the bombs shells). Tiny and small Planets get vaporized to Asteroids, larger planets depopulated und all buildings whiped off the planet. For who wants a downsized version, it would be just a matter of deleting a few lines of code.
Introducing such a weapon makes game balancing very importand. So limitations to the device are:
- expensive and timeconsuming to be built
- needs a "core" slot, so only very few ships can actually use the device
- onetime usage, then it requires a "refill" at a dedicated location, to make it not to simple for players to bomb their way through an enemy empire

The bomb actually works already, bombing only dedicated targets with the above mentioned effects...
but I got stuck at the task of "one-Time-usage"...

Getting the planet being bombed into focus is really easy using the "OrderedBombardedBy" command.
Getting the focus to the ship conducting the bombardement, however, I dont know...
Is there a "ShipOrderedToBombard" kind of thing?
Any help would be apreciated and all comments are welcome.
Best regards,
Robert


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 12:46 am 
Offline
Space Krill
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 12:37 am
Posts: 9
do "death spores" so anything at present ? I have used them on the same planet 4 turns in a row and seen no results. do i need to have a number of death spore-equipped ships equal to or more than the troop strength of a planet ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 1:07 am 
Offline
AI Lead, Programmer
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 6:25 pm
Posts: 4390
Cornflake wrote:
do "death spores" so anything at present ? I have used them on the same planet 4 turns in a row and seen no results.
One new-ish thing about Death Spores is that to use them the ship having them must target the enemy planet and select "Bombard" from the planet panel, akin to the invasion mechanism (but shields should not matter for Bombardment). Constraints that have always been there are that the enemy planet must be visible to you, and that Death Spores only work against Organic species.

_________________
If I provided any code, scripts or other content here, it's released under GPL 2.0 and CC-BY-SA 3.0


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2015 1:12 am 
Offline
Space Krill
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 12:37 am
Posts: 9
wow. noob error on my part. i bet my target was not organic. didn't even think about that. doh ! (slinks back to home planet iin shame)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2015 10:05 am 
Dilvish wrote:
and that Death Spores only work against Organic species.

Cornflake was not the only one who did not know that.
I propose to make that public by introducing it in the stringtables.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 12:43 am 
Offline
Dyson Forest
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2015 5:57 pm
Posts: 204
Dilvish wrote:
Death Spores only work against Organic species.


Perhaps we need techs for "death crystals" for lithic species "death nanites" for robotic species "death soot" for phototrophic species and "death fields" for self-sustaining species?

_________________
All of my contributions should be considered released under creative commons attribution share-alike license, CC-BY-SA 3.0 for use in, by and with the Free Orion project.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 5:26 pm 
Offline
Space Krill

Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 6:05 pm
Posts: 1
Hi Everyone,

First I want to say that I'm a huge fan of this game and I love what you guys are doing with it.

Regarding the bombardment\spore idea, I like it just for the spite factor alone. It also makes deep strike raiding a valid if slightly insidious option (otherwise the external engines are a waste of a perfectly good weapon slot). It doesn't actually address the end game grinding issue though, it just shifts it around a bit. What if, after a capitol world is conquered, the remaining planets just flipped over to native species and the remaining ships either disbanded or became monsters? Fluff-wise it makes sense, gameplay wise it speeds up the endgame, maybe a bit too much though? The biggest drawback that I can think of is that I've caught the AI with it's pants down in a couple of games and I haven't read enough of the code to piece together how easy that would be to mitigate or if it was a conscious design decision.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 2:17 am 
Offline
Creative Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 11:45 pm
Posts: 3291
Computergeek01 wrote:
Hi Everyone,

First I want to say that I'm a huge fan of this game and I love what you guys are doing with it.

Regarding the bombardment\spore idea, I like it just for the spite factor alone. It also makes deep strike raiding a valid if slightly insidious option (otherwise the external engines are a waste of a perfectly good weapon slot).

Yup, and now that troops are heavily dependent on population it can make invasions significantly easier as well, so much so I'm considering building ships with them instead of just using my pet monsters. Porbably need to do some cost/benefit balancing for it sooner rather than later though.
Quote:
It doesn't actually address the end game grinding issue though, it just shifts it around a bit. What if, after a capitol world is conquered, the remaining planets just flipped over to native species and the remaining ships either disbanded or became monsters? Fluff-wise it makes sense, gameplay wise it speeds up the endgame, maybe a bit too much though? The biggest drawback that I can think of is that I've caught the AI with it's pants down in a couple of games and I haven't read enough of the code to piece together how easy that would be to mitigate or if it was a conscious design decision.

AI decision making is an ongoing project, the AI team have done a lot to improve things of late but it's still, well, a computer algorithm that can't actually think.

I'd like to see more diplomacy options with a surrender/cede worlds system, but that's something that'll need to be worked through as and when the team have time to actually do some real work on the diplomacy system and I've no idea what the timescale is on developing that.

_________________
Mat Bowles

Any code or patches in anything posted here is released under the CC and GPL licences in use for the FO project.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 27, 2015 4:45 pm 
Offline
Space Squid

Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 57
labgnome wrote:
Dilvish wrote:
Death Spores only work against Organic species.


Perhaps we need techs for "death crystals" for lithic species "death nanites" for robotic species "death soot" for phototrophic species and "death fields" for self-sustaining species?


I just posted a patch in Other Game Design that addresses this.

_________________
All contributions are submitted under GPL or LGPL v2 or later, or under appropriate Creative Commons licence, consistent with project guidlines.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group