Search found 34 matches
- Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:58 pm
- Forum: Compile
- Topic: TechTreeWnd.cpp: 'ND_coord_i' was not declared in this scope
- Replies: 14
- Views: 3694
Re: TechTreeWnd.cpp: 'ND_coord_i' was not declared in this scope
Using the following patch I deduced from the link you posted, it did compile: --- UI/TechTreeWnd.cpp 2009-06-08 10:30:42.000000000 +0200 +++ UI/TechTreeWnd.cpp.oli 2009-06-08 14:04:17.073498823 +0200 @@ -1701,8 +1701,8 @@ const Tech* tech = GetTech(node->name); assert(tech); m_techs[tech] = new Tech...
- Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:35 am
- Forum: Compile
- Topic: TechTreeWnd.cpp: 'ND_coord_i' was not declared in this scope
- Replies: 14
- Views: 3694
Re: TechTreeWnd.cpp: 'ND_coord_i' was not declared in this scope
Coming back to the original topic, I'm getting the same error-message. I'm also having graphviz 2.22 installed but I can't go back to 2.20 since I'm building packages that should run on a normal installation. The system is Mandriva 2009.1 on an i586 machine. g++ -o UI/TechTreeWnd-human.o -c -pthread...
- Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:13 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: freeorion RPM-packages
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8070
Re: freeorion RPM-packages
Thanks, I'll use those revisions for building new packages...
Oliver
Oliver
- Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:56 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: freeorion RPM-packages
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8070
Re: freeorion RPM-packages
On which svn revision is FO 0.3.12 based? Which GG revision should be used?
Oliver
Oliver
- Sat Jan 31, 2009 11:31 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: freeorion RPM-packages
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8070
Re: freeorion RPM-packages
I built GG revision 695 and FO 0.3.11 (svn revision 2732), both should be available on the ftp tomorrow for i586 and src, x86_64 should follow. Mandriva users can just configure the repo using urpmi.addmedia mud_free_release ftp://ftp.mandrivauser.de/rpm/GPL/2009.0/i586/release for i586 or urpmi.add...
- Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:54 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: freeorion RPM-packages
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8070
Re: freeorion RPM-packages
I used 2725 when I built it, our new x86_64-packager just rebuilt my packages. I will do a new built in the next few days...
Oliver
EDIT: Should I prefer FO-2732svn and GG-695svn to the actual FO-2782svn and GG-700svn?
Oliver
EDIT: Should I prefer FO-2732svn and GG-695svn to the actual FO-2782svn and GG-700svn?
- Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:42 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: freeorion RPM-packages
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8070
Re: freeorion RPM-packages
Me again... x86_64 RPMs are up on the ftp. i586: [url]ftp://ftp.mandrivauser.de/rpm/GPL/2009.0/i586/release/[/ulr] x86_64: [url]ftp://ftp.mandrivauser.de/rpm/GPL/2009.0/x86_64/release/[/ulr] src: [url]ftp://ftp.mandrivauser.de/rpm/GPL/2009.0/SRPMS/release/[/ulr] All packages are svn-revision 2725......
- Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:32 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: freeorion RPM-packages
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8070
Re: freeorion RPM-packages
Just for information: We found a new member for our RPM-team who has an x86_64 machine. I hope we can provide x86_64 packages of GG and FO soon.
Oliver
Oliver
- Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:29 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: freeorion RPM-packages
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8070
Re: freeorion RPM-packages
I just wanted to inform: I fixed some minor glitches in the spec files of the gigi and freeorion packages. The packages are now available in the latest svn revisions 693 and 2725. Binary (i586) packages can be found at ftp://ftp.mandrivauser.de/rpm/GPL/2009.0/i586/release/ source-packages at ftp://f...
- Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:00 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: freeorion RPM-packages
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8070
Re: freeorion RPM-packages
I'm using VBox personally, it's OSS after all... You think about x86_64? The problem is, FO is needing quite a lot of resources to buil, it's needing loads of time, if you have only 512MB available. Since my system only has 1GB of RAM, I can't preserve more than 512MB for the VM. So it's not working...
- Mon Dec 22, 2008 8:53 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: freeorion RPM-packages
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8070
Re: freeorion RPM-packages
I just finished building new RPM-packages thanks to a patch posted in a thread of mine in the "compile" forum. GG svn-revision: 688 FreeOrion svn-revision: 2705 The packages were built on Mandrivalinux 2009.0, they will be uploaded on the mandrivauser.de ftp server in the next 12 hours. For the time...
- Mon Dec 22, 2008 8:48 pm
- Forum: Compile
- Topic: GG: scons trying to install files during build process
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1390
Re: GG: scons trying to install files during build process
Thanks!
That solved it...
GG and FO built just fine now!
Oliver
That solved it...
GG and FO built just fine now!
Oliver
- Fri Dec 19, 2008 11:11 pm
- Forum: Compile
- Topic: GG: scons trying to install files during build process
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1390
Re: GG: scons trying to install files during build process
Could anyone at least try to confirm it? Steps to reproduce: Sty user for the following steps: Then run scons configure prefix=/usr and then scons It should cancel the compile telling you it doesn't have the rights to write some file to /usr/lib/ This should not be the case, it shouldn't try to inst...
- Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:09 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: freeorion RPM-packages
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8070
Re: freeorion RPM-packages
Where you succesfull installing on SuSE?
Please let me know.
I'm momentarily trying to build up-to-date packages, but am facing some problems building GiGi.
Oliver
Please let me know.
I'm momentarily trying to build up-to-date packages, but am facing some problems building GiGi.
Oliver
- Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:02 am
- Forum: Compile
- Topic: GG: scons trying to install files during build process
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1390
GG: scons trying to install files during build process
Strangely enough I'm now facing a different problem, when trying to build with some test-directory as prefix, I'm getting an error-message about some boost-header, that will be solved in the near future, as Zach said in another topic. Now I tried installing it for real into /usr and I'm getting the ...