FreeOrion

so you build independence decree on Rana Beta I ? and was that happening the turn before? The independence decree (was that what I used? one building to get rid of the outpost) was built and finished, and the outpost marked as unowned, very many turns before DrKosy got there. Do you know if you had...

drkosy wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2024 9:43 pm I run into a strange combat report at Rana Beta.

could you note the turn?

so you build independence decree on Rana Beta I ? and was that happening the turn before?

And I am against it because it means that playing on a big Galaxy will be the same than playing on a smaller one, instead of producing different challenges. Incorrect, as I already told you several times in the past years: There are parameters for that. You could have a small galaxy that is impossi...

Removing influence cost for planets set to influence focus basically would side step the snowballing restriction too easily I think. I prefer making-use-of-neutrals I think. Anyone knows where exobots are currently standing? I'm quite sure a good solution would be to change the IP cost to take into ...

released latest weekly test build on beta and slow-game-026 latest amd64 stable v0.5 352 - - beta 2024-02-02.c7613c6b6 428 - - beta/slow-game-026 2024-02-02.c7613c6b6 428 - 2024-03-11T00:00:00Z

+1

Yeah allied traffic control seems like a really good idea. Giving the speed boost to also to allied empires in range (if they adopt the policy). Hm. What about likes and dislikes? Allied reformation would mean taking away the possibility to use the building without the policy. (Its possible to use c...

BlueAward wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2024 7:52 am And the change to give outposting rights to noncolonizing yet shipbuilding species! Awesome! Not sure if it's in the weekly build now thay I have a newer one

should be in the weekly (so it should be on the server). was merged as result of the dev meeting

the -10 stealth from an earlier distortion modulator would fit with the +10 stealth from focus/policy. i think this is a good idea - to accompany earlier access to anti-planetary stealth with a counter and protection focus is a good candidate. Setting a planet to defense denies most resource gains ...

I just wanted to make a note I like how playing at 100% research costs made you think about those costs. It really makes a difference to play at even 80% costs. Ophiuchus asked about default research costs at the online meeting and whether they felt too slow or the right pace. I don't have any part...

Hidden/undetected ships are stopped for one turn at the blockade regardless of the blockader not seeing them. But then the undetected, non-aggressive (not-initiating-combat) ships can continue their way next turn. So I guess there is some form of blockade thingy in the backend even for undetected s...

I take that 'tries to traverse a system' means that the attacker is trying to leave the system but could not? So if that system was the intended end system no combat triggers? Yes, two cases, as BlueAward said: - Destination is the defended system: ship fleet is not trying to go past any blockade a...

But I shall prepare a save with local repro That would be great. Sentinel should have 50 detection and no special monster weapons (only arc disruptor and death ray). Note: Arc disruptors do not use the FOCS condition (they should do the default thing). Death rays do use COMBAT_TARGETS_VISIBLE_ENEMY...

But I shall prepare a save with local repro That would be great. Sentinel should have 50 detection and no special monster weapons (only arc disruptor and death ray). Note: Arc disruptors do not use the FOCS condition (they should do the default thing). Death rays do use COMBAT_TARGETS_VISIBLE_ENEMY...

The better your computer the better you chance to hit with beam weapons. I really think that FO need something like that. A Titan is much more easy to hit than a small symbiotic hull. There is a standing design decision that there won't be probabilistic misses. So when we where discussing targeting...