Uh-oh. This is a problem. I'll add the latest versions of gigi to the zipfile, but the new ones won't work with the v0.2 executable, so just run everything from within the unzipped designer-tools.zip. I'll change the documentation to reflect this. Download it again in about 10 minutes.pd wrote:tzlaine, i did this of course...
i'm using the gigil.dll from the v0.2 release... maybe there is a new one?
Please read the design/effects document!
Moderators: Oberlus, Committer
- Geoff the Medio
- Programming, Design, Admin
- Posts: 13587
- Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 1:33 am
- Location: Munich
I don't want it to catch everything... I just want it to catch references to prereqs that aren't defined. This seems like one of the most basic and important things for a utility like this to do.tzlaine wrote:There are other things that you can do to cause a crash. The point is that I can't be spending all my time writing this little utility app when I have to write most of the FO code as well. It will never catch everything, and I'm not going to work on it much more, if any.Geoff the Medio wrote: How is a nonexistant prereq that causes a crash not a glaring mistake?
If you won't, I may take a look at adding/fixing it. I don't suppose you have working msvc project files for tech-check and the other DesignerTools?
That would be fine by me. I just don't have the time.Geoff the Medio wrote:I don't want it to catch everything... I just want it to catch references to prereqs that aren't defined. This seems like one of the most basic and important things for a utility like this to do.tzlaine wrote:There are other things that you can do to cause a crash. The point is that I can't be spending all my time writing this little utility app when I have to write most of the FO code as well. It will never catch everything, and I'm not going to work on it much more, if any.Geoff the Medio wrote: How is a nonexistant prereq that causes a crash not a glaring mistake?
If you won't, I may take a look at adding/fixing it.
No, but that's because there aren't any. You need to install Python and SCons. SCons is an alternative build system that works on virtually any platform. You can get it at http://www.scons.org . You need to alter your PATH environment variable globally or within the shell in which you run SCons (preferably a "Visual Studio .NET Command Prompt" console) to include your python directory, then just type "scons".I don't suppose you have working msvc project files for tech-check and the other DesignerTools?
Where can I find msvcp71d.dll? I tried renaming msvcp71.dll and all I get is a huge page of errors and a crash, so I'm assuming that's not a viable workaround I'm an artist not a programmer, so apologies if I'm doing something boneheaded.
Good afternoon! This is the Earth Alliance embassy diplomatic office. My name is Alex. How may I assist you?
HUMANS! BLAUGHRAN EMPIRE CLAIMS PLANET KREIGHTON! YOU GIVE RAY GUN SCIENCE OR BLAUGHRANS DESTROY HUMANS ON KREIGHTON!!!
HUMANS! BLAUGHRAN EMPIRE CLAIMS PLANET KREIGHTON! YOU GIVE RAY GUN SCIENCE OR BLAUGHRANS DESTROY HUMANS ON KREIGHTON!!!
hmm, not sure what's going on there, but it seems something is wrong with your stringtable. there shouldn't be html tags in there. try doing this:
- extract the designer tools into a new(empty) folder
- make sure all needed dlls are in there too(msvcp71.dll, msvcp71d.dll, msvcr71.dll, ...)
- create a sub folder called 'default'
- put in the techs.xml and eng_stingtable.txt from the CVS(make sure you really got the .txt and .xml file and not this cvs site -> click on view and/or download)
- start tech-view.exe
should work like a charm.
- extract the designer tools into a new(empty) folder
- make sure all needed dlls are in there too(msvcp71.dll, msvcp71d.dll, msvcr71.dll, ...)
- create a sub folder called 'default'
- put in the techs.xml and eng_stingtable.txt from the CVS(make sure you really got the .txt and .xml file and not this cvs site -> click on view and/or download)
- start tech-view.exe
should work like a charm.
- Geoff the Medio
- Programming, Design, Admin
- Posts: 13587
- Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 1:33 am
- Location: Munich
Re: Please read the design/effects document!
Forgive me if I'm overlooking something, but this thread refers to tech documentation hosted here:
http://www.freeorion.org/wiki/index.php?title=Effects
but this page is unavailable.
Is work on the tech tree slowing down to focus on the combat system/v0.4 items?
As I read through the wiki and the forums I'm trying to get an idea of the state of the project and see where I can contribute. I'm not sure if I need to knock out the bugs listed on sourceforge and spit out an idea every once in a while in the forums, or if I can put together some tech tree additions, work on descriptions, propose modifiers and post them here for the devs.
Any direction would be quite helpful.
http://www.freeorion.org/wiki/index.php?title=Effects
but this page is unavailable.
Is work on the tech tree slowing down to focus on the combat system/v0.4 items?
As I read through the wiki and the forums I'm trying to get an idea of the state of the project and see where I can contribute. I'm not sure if I need to knock out the bugs listed on sourceforge and spit out an idea every once in a while in the forums, or if I can put together some tech tree additions, work on descriptions, propose modifiers and post them here for the devs.
Any direction would be quite helpful.
- Geoff the Medio
- Programming, Design, Admin
- Posts: 13587
- Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 1:33 am
- Location: Munich
Re: Please read the design/effects document!
This thread is very out of date. The link can be fixed by removing the /wiki part, or you can find the Effects document by searching on the wiki / freeorion.org main page.
The tech tree is not receiving any official attention now, and won't until ships and combat stuff is designed enough to be able to plan the basic layout of ships-related tech.
If you want to make some techs to fill out the existing tree, feel free. A lot of the current content is temporary though, so it's probably not the best use of your time.
The tech tree is not receiving any official attention now, and won't until ships and combat stuff is designed enough to be able to plan the basic layout of ships-related tech.
If you want to make some techs to fill out the existing tree, feel free. A lot of the current content is temporary though, so it's probably not the best use of your time.